Friday, April 15, 2011

In progress

There are several things I have been working on around curriculum. Some of the things I have been looking at include scope and sequence, material being covered, and approach. These are all things I am trying to address in my inquiry project as well. I have been put in the position to determine what the curriculum or content should be for art at the elementary level. This is nice because I get to decide what I am going to teach. It is also overwhelming because I have the responsibility to prepare the students for future education and need to make sure I am including the right content at the right time the right way. I have been able to create many interesting lessons, which engage the students and teach them different aspects of art. I am now in the process of organizing the lessons to be sequential and build upon each other without being too repetitive. This is where the scope and sequence come into play. I am reading an interesting book for my inquiry project called “Art and Cognition” by Arthur D. Efland which talks a little bit about the developmental stages. I am hoping this, along with the PEI’s and other sequential material will help me in this process. Where I work at an elementary level the material being covered touches on much of the basics. Taking those basic art concepts and presenting them in a sequential, engaging way is something I am constantly trying to improve. Throughout this course we have been learning the importance of technology to our 21st century learners. I think really reinforces the necessity for a strong art program to help students interpret, understand, and express through visual imagery, which bombards their everyday life.
Unfortunately, not everyone sees it this way. One of the things I would like to change which is not in my power is scheduling. While this may not seem like part of the curriculum I think it affects it greatly. Without the right setting of adequate space and time we are extremely limited to what type of learning environment we can create. This learning environment is something that needs to be adapted to our 21st century learners. I believe I have the right content here but without adequate time and space we are limited in the process application, which we need to focus on. Giving students a chance to problem solve and think critically is such an important part of this subject that we need to give it the appropriate time and focus it needs. Something I find fascinating is that even though art is acknowledged as a core subject by the NCLB Act along with the many studies about the importance of the arts, they are still usually only taught once a week compared to the other “core” subjects which are taught everyday. Although art for art’s sake may not be taught everyday, it would be nice to have more collaboration between subjects to incorporate art into them and vise versa. It is such a big part of how students perceive the world today attention should be given to it’s aspects as it’s involved with any of the other subjects. Until art is on the standardized test though it will constantly be trying to advocate for its place in schools.

5 comments:

  1. Sounds like a great opportunity to develop an exciting art curriculum! And I completely agree with your scheduling comments - I often feel that our science curriculum is ham-stringed by the schedule constraints. A fundamental component of science is labs, and with 48 minute classes, it's just not an authentic experience... Despite science starting to show up on the standardized test. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have been struggling with scope and sequence myself. This year I let the students decide where we started but I have realized that I need to find a better way to make the four units flow into each other.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It must be very exciting to be able to have some control over what will be taught. Scheduling does seem to be always a problem. When I was dealing with elementary school classes, I had a problem with the way the specialists were scheduled into the day. It seemed like every time I just got started on something, everyone had to pack up and go to art, gym, or music. I was starting to think that the best way to take care of this was to make an entire day when the class was devoted to specialists alone. This would give those teachers the opportunity to be more flexible in their planning--taking turns adding on activities, or combining activities with other groups, etc. It probably would be difficult to arrange something like that, especially if the school was large, but it seems that it would be worth looking at.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What if you spend half your day working with teachers to incorporate art in the larger curriculum and the balance of your time teaching separate art classes...as you do now. Or some other configuration than all separate art classes that meet relatively infrequently? Would that make a difference?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great to have some control over curriculum, but a daunting task at best to create curriculum for the entire elementary level. Are you working with a team or is this mainly a solo project? Also, I have great sympathy for you in terms of dealing with a schedule over which you have no input. When will we start to realize that time o learning and student grouping has great impact on the scope and sequence of curriculum.

    ReplyDelete